Cases 91 - 100 of 3,641
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogstad v. Richardson et al
as 1:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
Jesse Rogstad
Defendant:
Warden Richardson and IDOC Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beck v. State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Kali Beck and Karter G. Beck
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merkley et al v. Idaho Board of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Wayne D Merkley, Stephen Floyd Ullrich, George Crider and others
Defendant:
Idaho Board of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.
as 1:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., Randy Valley and Rona Siegert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Jonathan F Dillard
Defendant:
United States, US Marshals, Deborah Gresham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Storm v. McClusky et al
as 1:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Rick Storm and Rickie Storm
Defendant:
David McClusky, Dodds Hayden, Karen Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpentier v. State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00535
Petitioner:
Alfred L. Carpentier
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
