Cases 91 - 100 of 7,200
Smith v. Doe et al
as 6:2023cv06719
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Smith
Defendant:
John Doe and Niagara Falls Polices
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lasher v. Conroy et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Brian Lasher
Defendant:
Amber Conroy, City of Niagara Falls, New York, City of Niagara Falls Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. New York State Parole
as 6:2024cv06026
Plaintiff:
Carl Norton, Sr.
Defendant:
New York State Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Bonanro
as 1:2023cv01307
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Paul E. Bonanro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lettieri v. Federal Marshals
as 1:2023cv01259
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Federal Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lettieri v. Vilardo
as 6:2023cv06690
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Lawrence Joseph Vilardo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hall v. Baxter et al
as 6:2024cv06002
Plaintiff:
Drevon Hall
Defendant:
Todd Baxter and Deputy Latona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Garver et al
as 1:2023cv01279
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Randall E. Garver and Michael Mockwater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Wolcott
as 6:2023cv06718
Petitioner:
Frank Garcia
Respondent:
J. Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitehead v. New York State Dept. of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Jack Whitehead
Defendant:
New York State Dept. of Corrections and Community Supervision, C.O. Pew, C.O. Gouchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
