Cases 91 - 100 of 4,186
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Bartels et al
as 5:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amy Bartels, David Batton Law, Washington Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hemphill, LLC v. Board of Trustees of the Town of Dickson, Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Hemphill, LLC
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of the Town of Dickson, Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Muscogee (Creek) Nation
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, G T Bynum, Wendell Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362 Indian Tribal Controversy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hamlin v. Becerra
as 5:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
John Paul Hamlin
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
