Cases 91 - 100 of 2,339
Bosch Rexroth Corporation v. Scott Johnson Specialty Services, LLC
as 5:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Bosch Rexroth Corporation
Defendant:
Scott Johnson Specialty Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
The Mississippi Bar v. Patrick
as 3:2023ad00003
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Megan Mariah Patrick
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
The Mississippi Bar v. Brooks
as 3:2023ad00002
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Brandon LaRue Brooks
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Bey v. Rocha et al
as 3:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Victor Rocha, Roy Jakobs, Royal Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Brasfield & Gorrie, L.L.C. v. The Hanover Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Brasfield & Gorrie, L.L.C.
Defendant:
The Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Smith-Garcia v. Atwood et al
as 3:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
David Smith-Garcia
Defendant:
Emmett Ray Atwood and David Garland Atwood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
