Cases 91 - 100 of 4,183
Keenan v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv01121
Plaintiff:
Don Keenan
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of and Todd Russ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Bartels et al
as 5:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amy Bartels, David Batton Law, Washington Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gutlerrez v. Sebastian et al
as 5:2023cv01092
Plaintiff:
Juan Ismael Garcia Gutlerrez
Defendant:
Shane Sebastian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hemphill, LLC v. Board of Trustees of the Town of Dickson, Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Hemphill, LLC
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of the Town of Dickson, Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Oklahoma State of v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 5:2023cv01052
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma State of
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Jessica S Marcella and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hamlin v. Becerra
as 5:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
John Paul Hamlin
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
