Cases 101 - 110 of 53,197
Adamowicz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
KAREN CRONIN, GENE ADAMOWICZ, MARY BEBBER and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
Ruderman v. Law Office of Yuriy Prakhin, P.C.
as 24-1186
Plaintiff:
YELENA RUDERMAN
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF YURIY PRAKHIN, P.C. and YURIY PRAKHIN, in both his individual and professional capacities
Heredia v. City of New York
as 24-1185
Plaintiff:
DIEGO HEREDIA
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Det. THOMAS DONEGAN and others
Lettieri v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 24-1187
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Shin v. Party Well Rest & Oriental Bakery Inc.
as 24-1189
Plaintiff:
WOUN JAE SHIN
Defendant:
PARTY WELL REST & ORIENTAL BAKERY INC., DANIEL AHN and YOUNG JOON AHN
United States of America v. Murray
as 24-1190
Defendant:
WILLIE MURRAY and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chowdhury v. Garland
as 24-1170
Petitioner:
JAHANGIR CHOWDHURY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Eubanks v. Hansell
as 24-1165
Plaintiff:
JAMAL EUBANKS, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Jace Eubanks, deceased and J. E., an infant, by his father and natural guardian, Jamal Eubanks
Defendant:
DAVID HANSELL, former Commissioner, NEW YORK CITY ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, JOHN AND JANE ROES, said names being fictitious and intended to represent individual attorneys, caseworkers, investigators, youth development specialists, members, agents, servants and/or employees of the New York City Administration for Children's S and others
Torres v. Sher Tremonte LLP
as 24-1164
Plaintiff:
JOSE O. TORRES
Defendant:
SHER TREMONTE LLP, JUSTIN SHER, MICHAEL TREMONTE and others
Tan v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 24-1162
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER SHAPOVALOV, CHEW KING TAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and IGOR LI
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and MORGAN STANLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
