Cases 101 - 110 of 5,556
Toth et al v. Toth-Ledesma et al
as 3:2023cv01258
Plaintiff:
Alex Toth and Gladys Martinez-Toth
Defendant:
Alexandria Toth-Ledesma and Michael Ledesma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bond v. Equifax Inc.
as 4:2023cv01218
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Bond
Defendant:
Equifax Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kline v. Chilton
as 4:2023cv01211
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
Cameron M. Chilton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Fridline v. Bottom Line Concepts, LLC
as 4:2023cv01193
Plaintiff:
Zachary Fridline
Defendant:
Bottom Line Concepts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Chasse v. M.S. Investments Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2023cv01192
Plaintiff:
Evan Chasse
Defendant:
M.S. Investments Mortgage Company, Mike Saleh, Libby Saleh and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Fridline v. Integrity Vehicle Group, Inc et al
as 4:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Zachary Fridline
Defendant:
Integrity Vehicle Group, Inc and Natcap, Inc. doing business as Vanguard Vehicle Armor
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Chasse v. Sunvena Solar LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01186
Plaintiff:
Evan Chasse
Defendant:
Sunvena Solar LLC and Hunter Potalivo
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ruminski's Market, LLC v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Ruminski's Market, LLC
Defendant:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
