Cases 101 - 108 of 108
CRUMP et al v. AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2008cv90833
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R CRUMP and ALVENA CRUMP
Defendant:
AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CRUMP v. RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86712
Plaintiff:
WILLIE V. CRUMP and WILLIE V. CRUMP
Defendant:
RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION, THE BENDIX CORPORATION, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CRUMP v. NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv83657
Plaintiff:
WOODROW S. CRUMP
Defendant:
NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CRUMP v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv02253
Plaintiff:
THERESA J. CRUMP
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CRUMP v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv79039
Plaintiff:
WILLIE CRUMP
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GULF BELTING & GASKET CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
COCKRELL et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv70906
Plaintiff:
ODENE COCKRELL, ROBBIE W. CRUMP, FLETCHER COCKRELL and others
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CRUMP et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv60944
Plaintiff:
JAMES L CRUMP and MARY CRUMP
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CRUMP et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBEGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv61034
Plaintiff:
JOHN CRUMP and BARBARA CRUMP
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBEGLAS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, ACANDS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
