Cases 101 - 110 of 1,156
Worth v. Warden, FCC Coleman-USP 1
as 5:2022cv00126
Petitioner:
Tyler Edward Worth
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tucker v. USPS
as 2:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Tucker
Defendant:
USPS and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Oliver v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2022cv20977
Plaintiff:
Arrington Oliver
Defendant:
David Gonzales, Thomas Bergami and Wardens of USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James v. Coleman USP 1
as 5:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
Coleman USP 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2022cv00163
Petitioner:
Romancee Oshay George
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Corey Davis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden, USP Coleman 1, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Glasgow v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2022cv00065
Petitioner:
Alvin John Glasgow
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Myers v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2022cv14063
Plaintiff:
Ms. Linda Myers
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, USPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
DURBIN v. United States Postal Service, USPS
as 8:2022cv00595
Plaintiff:
MOLLY DURBIN
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, USPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Dunlap v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2021cv00607
Petitioner:
Jason Dunlap
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
