Cases 101 - 110 of 2,219
LeCheminant v. Thanksgiving Point Institute et al
as 2:2022cv00774
Plaintiff:
Annelise LeCheminant
Defendant:
Thanksgiving Point Institute, Inc., David James Stroud, Blake Ryan Wigdahl and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
DP Creations v. Jiaheng
as 2:2022cv00772
Plaintiff:
DP Creations a Utah limited liability company doing business as Bountiful Baby
Defendant:
Chen Jiaheng an individual doing business as Susette
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Gabb Wireless v. Troomi Wireless et al
as 2:2021cv00253
Defendant:
Troomi Wireless and William Brady
Counter Claimant:
David L. Preece
Counter Defendant:
Gabb Wireless
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Stepstone Connect v. Toone
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Stepstone Connect
Defendant:
Barry Clark Toone
M&M Gutters v. M&M Exteriors et al
as 2:2022cv00662
Plaintiff:
M&M Gutters a Utha corporation doing business as M&M Gutters and Exteriors
Counter Claimant:
M&M Exteriors and Mike Odiel Maldonado Medina
Counter Defendant:
M&M Gutters
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Bala Bangles Inc. v. EA Commerce LLC
as 2:2022cv00655
Plaintiff:
Bala Bangles Inc.
Defendant:
EA Commerce LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
TMRR v. CBC Mortgage Agency
as 2:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
TMRR
Defendant:
CBC Mortgage Agency
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Alfwear v. Windsong Brands LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00741
Plaintiff:
Alfwear
Defendant:
Windsong Brands and CloudVeil Mountain Peak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
UFirst Federal Credit Union v. University First Federal Credit Union
as 2:2022cv00646
Plaintiff:
UFirst Federal Credit Union
Defendant:
University First Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
