Cases 101 - 110 of 15,309
Jaber v. Rodriguez
as 5:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Faouzi Jaber
Defendant:
W Rodriguez and W. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PERKINS v. FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL et al
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
SEAN KRIS PERKINS
Defendant:
FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL, MIKE MCCORMICK and SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUFF v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN HUFF
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. SECY DEPT OF CORRECTIONS FACILITY SUPPORT et al
as 4:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT III
Defendant:
SECT DEPT OF CORRECTIONS FACILITY SUPPORT and JAY PAY REPRESENTATIVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeClerc v. Branham
as 3:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen LeClerc
Defendant:
Jeb T. Branham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vega v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Walter Wilfredo Vega
Defendant:
State of Florida, Assistant State Attorney's MRS, Erin Hugnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Pinellas County Sheriff's Department et al
as 8:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
Avery Ellis
Defendant:
Pinellas County Sheriff's Department and Bob Gualtieri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parkin v. Naphcare, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Mitchell Parkin
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaffer v. Ward et al
as 8:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shaffer
Defendant:
Laura E. Ward, Giana Ana and Maria Pavlidis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chalifoux v. Mendoza et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Chalifoux
Defendant:
Carlos Eduardo Mendoza and Leslie Hoffman Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
