Cases 101 - 110 of 1,979
Scaperotta v. State of Hawaii Public Defenders Office
as 1:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jay Scaperotta
Defendant:
State of Hawaii Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Hardy K. Ah Puck, Jr.
as 1:2022cv00542
In Re:
In The Matter Of:
Petitioner:
Hardy K. Ah Puck, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scaperotta v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2022cv00489
Petitioner:
Christopher Jay Scaperotta
Respondent:
State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paopao v. USA
as 1:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Faanimo Paopao
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Shamblin v. USA
as 1:2022cv00538
Petitioner:
James Wayne Shamblin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Nguyen v. USA
as 1:2022cv00529
Petitioner:
Thao Thi Nguyen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Huihui v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00508
Petitioner:
Kaniu Huihui
Respondent:
Estelle Derr and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Abd-Rahmaan v. Wahikoa et al
as 1:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
Khatib M. Abd-Rahmaan
Defendant:
Celia Wahikoa, Daniel S. K. Kawakami and Neal Wagatsuma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ventrella v. Wead
as 1:2022cv00448
Petitioner:
Michael Ventrella
Respondent:
Shawn Wead
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cabebe v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00496
Petitioner:
Anabel Cabebe
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
