Cases 111 - 120 of 321
YOUNG v. HARRAH'S RESORT ATLANTIC CITY et al
as 1:2016cv08027
Plaintiff:
CAROL YOUNG
Defendant:
HARRAH'S RESORT ATLANTIC CITY , CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION , JOHN DOE I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv07205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CLASE v. AETNA BETTER HEALTH OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2016cv05387
Plaintiff:
ANGEL CLASE
Defendant:
AETNA BETTER HEALTH OF NEW JERSEY , JOHN DOE I-X and ABC CORP. I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FRANIC v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05359
Plaintiff:
BEBRA FRANIC
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. , JOHN DOE I-X and ABC CORP. I-X
Cross_claimant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cross_defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SAMUEL et al v. MULFORD
as 2:2016cv05212
Plaintiff:
ROBYN M. SAMUEL and AUGUSTUS A. SAMUEL, SR.
Defendant:
MELINDA B. MULFORD, XYZ EMPLOYER I-X, ABC EMPLOYER I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
BAKIRTZIS v. DITECH FINANCIAL LLC et al
as 2:2016cv05154
Plaintiff:
STELLA BAKIRTZIS
Defendant:
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC , SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERIVICING and JOHN DOES I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SHIBLES v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv04357
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY SHIBLES
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SERVICE ONE, INC. and JOHN DOES I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
