Cases 111 - 120 of 133
Jones v. Michael Astrue
as 2:2007cv02527
Plaintiff:
Pamela Jones and Pamela Jones
Appellee:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
King v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2007cv02523
Appellant:
Troy King and Troy King
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales and David Kustoff
Appellee:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hogg v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01138
Plaintiff:
Edwin J. Hogg, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Alberto Gonzales and David Kustoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Yancy v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01134
Plaintiff:
Daphene Yancy
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Alberto Gonzales and David Kustoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sanders v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01133
Plaintiff:
Robert Sanders
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Alberto Gonzales and David Kustoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Walker v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv02476
Appellant:
Billy J. Walker
Appellee:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Campbell v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv02475
Appellant:
Alfred J Campbell
Appellee:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McIntosh v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01126
Plaintiff:
William K. McIntosh
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Alberto Gonzales and David Kustoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Baker v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01125
Plaintiff:
Jeanie Baker
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Alberto Gonzalos and David Kustoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Riley v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv02191
Appellant:
Willie Riley and Willie Riley
Appellee:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
