Cases 111 - 120 of 1,054
EARL v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as 2:2011cv63343
Plaintiff:
EDMOND EARL
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MULVIHILL v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv62558
Plaintiff:
MYRL MULVIHILL
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , OWENS-ILLINOIS CORPORATION , PITTSBURGH-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLOUTIER et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv63255
Plaintiff:
LEO N. CLOUTIER and ADELINA M. CLOUTIER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC. , AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. , FIBERBOARD PAPER PRODUCTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAWLOWSKI v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as PAE/2:11-CV-63284
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Plaintiff:
PAWLOWSKI
ROBAR et al v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv63179
Plaintiff:
FLOYD ROBAR and GLADYS ROBAR
Defendant:
GAF CORP., EASTERN REFRACTORIES CO., INC., CATHERINE MOHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv62977
Plaintiff:
RALPH MARTIN
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , OWENS-ILLINOIS CORP. , PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OROSZ v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as PAE/2:11-CV-63308
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Plaintiff:
OROSZ
GARY v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as PAE/2:11-CV-63306
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Plaintiff:
GARY
RICKEL v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2011cv64197
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. RICKEL
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, NATIONAL GYPSUM CO, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PICKETT et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2011cv62617
Plaintiff:
LAURA L. PICKETT and WILLIAM H. MONROE, JR.,
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., GAF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
