Cases 111 - 117 of 117
Richardson, Roy Dale v. USA, et al
as 98-5176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roy Dale Richardson
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Defense, United States Department of the Air Force and others
Appointed Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Steven Harris Goldblatt
Davis, Michael Lee v. DC, et al
as 97-7043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Lee Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia and Dwight Bynum, Corporal, Central Facility
Intervenor For Appellee:
United States of America
Appointed Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Steven Harris Goldblatt
USA v. Ortiz, Lionel
as 96-3123
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Lionel Ortiz, also known as Leonel Carlos Ortiz, also known as Carlos
Appointed Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Steven Harris Goldblatt
Tucker, Cornelius v. NO FILINGS FROM SILO, et al
as 96-5177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cornelius Tucker, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
G. Branker, Captain, Bill Clinton, U.S. President and Al Gore
Movant:
Jerome Silo, Jerome Silo, Jerome Silo and others
Appointed Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Steven Harris Goldblatt, Professor
Ibrahim, Jibril L. v. DC, et al
as 96-7069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jibril L. Ibrahim, also known as Grant Anderson
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia and The Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia
Appointed Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Steven Harris Goldblatt
Peralta, Rolando v. US Attys Off
as 96-5068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rolando Peralta
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Attorney's Office, Central District of California
Appointed Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Steven Harris Goldblatt
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 95-5357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Terminated Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
