Cases 111 - 120 of 509
Flores v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00243
Petitioner:
Cesar C. Flores
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Damiani-Melendez v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00126
Petitioner:
Pablo Damiani-Melendez
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00052
Petitioner:
Brandon Robinson
Respondent:
Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finney v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv01324
Petitioner:
Johnny Finney
Respondent:
Robert Pierce, State Of Delaware and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Russell v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv01281
Petitioner:
Eric D. Russell
Respondent:
David E. Pierce, State Of Delaware and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv01178
Petitioner:
Jonatan Rodriguez
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Pierce
as 1:2016cv01164
Petitioner:
Tywaan Johnson
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McNeil v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv01083
Petitioner:
Nathan McNeil
Respondent:
David Pierce, State Of Delaware and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Philhower v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv01062
Petitioner:
Harold E. Philhower
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hunter v. Pierce, et al.
as 1:2016cv01002
Petitioner:
Marion Peter Hunter
Respondent:
State Of Delaware, David Pierce, Martin B. O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
