Cases 111 - 120 of 1,047
HUNT v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68075
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HUNT
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY , A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WORKMAN v. DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2010cv68071
Plaintiff:
JOHN WORKMAN
Defendant:
DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC , GARLOCK INC , GENERAL REFRACTORIES CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETROVICS v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68137
Plaintiff:
LASZLO PETROVICS
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC , GARLOCK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIGGENBOTHAM v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv68101
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HIGGENBOTHAM
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC. , BEAZER PLC, DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NICHOLS v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68105
Plaintiff:
LEONARD R NICHOLS
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CSR LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RISCHAR v. AC&S et al
as 2:2010cv68088
Plaintiff:
CHARLES G RISCHAR
Defendant:
AC&S, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, A P GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv68132
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN DAVIS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC , GARLOCK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILLIG v. AC & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68120
Plaintiff:
GLENN F HILLIG
Defendant:
AC & S INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGMENT CORPORATION and others
OWSLEY v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68090
Plaintiff:
DONALD E. OWSLEY
Defendant:
A C & S INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAY v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv68099
Plaintiff:
LOWELL O RAY
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC , GARLOCK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
