Cases 111 - 120 of 29,661
Campbell v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv02832
Plaintiff:
Bryan Campbell
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Chung v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Barrington Yee Chung
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Magrino v. Social Security
as 7:2024cv02878
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dean Magrino
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Caputo v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 1:2024cv02829
Plaintiff:
Tawn Alice Caputo
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security Of The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Reyes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02849
Plaintiff:
Indira Reyes
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harrell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02794
Plaintiff:
Robert James Harrell, Jr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bourabah v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02796
Plaintiff:
Rosa Bourabah
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Brown v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02809
Plaintiff:
Erinn Brown
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Salisbury v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Salisbury
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Setser v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Setser
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
