Cases 111 - 120 of 173
US Bank National Association et al v. Martenson et al
as 1:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association and Mortgage Pass Through Certificates
Defendant:
Sven Martenson and Susan Martenson
Counter_claimant:
Susan Martenson and Sven Martenson
Counter_defendant:
Mortgage Pass Through Certificates and US Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bank of America, et al v. Kansas CVS Pharmacy
as 12-3260
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 75TH METCALF ASSOCIATES, LLC, NANCY GEE and others
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
KANSAS CVS PHARMACY, LLC
Federal Home Loan Mortgage v. Pitt et al
as 2:2012cv00925
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Defendant:
Harold Pitt and Deloa Pitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Branch Banking & Trust v. Cordova et al
as 2:2012cv00888
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking & Trust
Defendant:
Abel Clay Landeo Cordova and Nuvia Lizeth Rocha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Central Mortgage v. Berbert et al
as 2:2012cv00749
Plaintiff:
Central Mortgage
Defendant:
John Berbert and Monica Berbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Benson v. Phipps
as 1:2012cv00133
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Benson
Defendant:
Joseph Phipps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
USA v. Maddux
as 2:2012cv00564
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Joshua Maddux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Fairfax Portfolio v. Owens Corning Insulating
as 12-3126
Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant - Appellant:
FAIRFAX PORTFOLIO, LLC
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
OWENS CORNING INSULATING SYSTEMS, LLC
Powderwood Condominium Association v. Monson
as 2:2012cv00379
Plaintiff:
Powderwood Condominium Association
Defendant:
Royce L. Monson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Skyline Holding Group v. Smith et al
as 2:2012cv00258
Defendant:
Tom Smith and Victor Vilchez
Plaintiff:
Skyline Holding Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
