Cases 111 - 120 of 6,012
Nofs v. William et al
as 4:2023cv13247
Plaintiff:
Nofs Mary and Mary Nofs
Defendant:
Needham William, Sixt Rent-A-Car and Meemic Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Eastep V. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2023cv13239
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Eastep
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Ravula et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv10272
Plaintiff:
Srihari Ravula and Deepa Irri
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Dinning v. HealthEC LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10071
Plaintiff:
Douglas Dinning
Defendant:
HealthEC LLC, Corewell Health, Oakwood Accountable Care Organization, LLC d/b/a Beaumont ACO and others
Owczarzak v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
as 5:2023cv13113
Plaintiff:
Gerard Owczarzak
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Peterson v. Whitehead et al
as 2:2023cv13080
Plaintiff:
Alissa Peterson
Defendant:
Bert Whitehead, IV, Access Legal Care and Whitehead Estate
Piper v. Dolgencorp, LLC
as 2:2023cv13068
Plaintiff:
Edward T Piper
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC d/b/a Dollar General and Dolgencorp, LLC Doing business as Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Patton v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv13237
Plaintiff:
Amanda Patton
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers, LLC and Taco Bell of America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LENTO LAW GROUP, P.C. v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2024cv10031
Plaintiff:
Lento Law Group, P.C.
Defendant:
Ladel Lewis, Linda Ann Pohly, FLORENDA LEE-HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Etter v. Guerrero et al
as 2:2024cv10169
Plaintiff:
Terry T Etter
Defendant:
Noe Guerrero and Chris Fann Transportation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
