Cases 111 - 120 of 355
IN RE: MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE, ET AL., MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
as 2:2010md02190
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALSTON v. LVNV FUNDING, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv05330
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA F. ALSTON
Defendant:
LVNV FUNDING, LLC, EDWIN A. ABRAHAMEN AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. and MICHAEL F. RATCHFORD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WULF v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2010cv05176
Plaintiff:
RICHARD M. WULF, JR.
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
BLUNDEN v. EMIGRANT MORTGAGE CO., INC.
as 2:2010cv04414
Plaintiff:
HELEN BLUNDEN
Defendant:
EMIGRANT MORTGAGE CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
BERKERY v. HSBC USA, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv04059
Plaintiff:
BRONWYN M. BERKERY
Defendant:
HSBC USA, INC., HSBC BANK, N.A., INC., HSBC RETAIL SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROBICHAW v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P. et al
as 2:2010cv03961
Plaintiff:
DAISEY M. ROBICHAW
Defendant:
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P. and EQUITY RESOURCES, INC.
Cross_claimant:
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.
Cross_defendant:
EQUITY RESOURCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
GOLTZ et al v. EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv02880
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GOLTZ and KAREN GOLTZ
Defendant:
EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
EL v. LITTON LOAN SERVICING
as 2:2010cv02571
Plaintiff:
MECCA EL
Defendant:
LITTON LOAN SERVICING
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HAVILAND et al v. MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE et al
as 2:2010cv02195
Plaintiff:
BARBARA HAVILAND , MAURA MCDAID and CATHERINE ROSELLI
Defendant:
MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Casannova v. Hampton Inn, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00993
Plaintiff:
Andrew Casannova
Defendant:
Hampton Inn, Inc., John Does 1-10 and XYZ Corporations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
