Cases 111 - 120 of 296
WASHINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv01112
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY and GRACE CHUNG BECKER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PAGE COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv01113
Plaintiff:
PAGE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY and GRACE CHUNG BECKER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AMHERST COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv00780
Plaintiff:
AMHERST COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY and GRACE CHUNG BECKER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HILL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA POLICE CHIEF et al
as 1:2008cv00526
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD HILL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA POLICE CHIEF and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA U.S. ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BAY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2007cv02258
Plaintiff:
LAURIE C. BAY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and JOHN B. CATOE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
DOMINGUEZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2007cv02105
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. DOMINGUEZ
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ADRIAN M. FENTY and VINCENT C. GRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MIDDLESEX COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01485
Plaintiff:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES and WAN J. KIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471 Declaratory & Injunctive Relief - Foreclo
WASHINGTON v. POTTER
as 1:2007cv00379
Plaintiff:
BOBBY WASHINGTON
Defendant:
JOHN E. POTTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
ESSEX COUNTY VIRGINIA v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2006cv01631
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
NORTHWEST AUSTIN MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER ONE v. GONZALES
as 1:2006cv01384
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
