Cases 121 - 130 of 836
JACKSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86322
Defendant:
3M, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TOMMY L. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUPSTID v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86292
Defendant:
OAKFABCO, INC., IMO INDUSTRIES, D.B. RILEY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DUIE LEE CUPSTID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RATCLIFF v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86362
Defendant:
EXXON MOBIL CORP., BECHTEL CORPORATION, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOND v. RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86686
Plaintiff:
RONNIE BOND and RONNIE BOND
Defendant:
RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION, THE BENDIX CORPORATION, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
POPICK v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86359
Defendant:
BECHTEL CORPORATION, JOHN CRANE, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ALLEN POPICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86697
Plaintiff:
CARRIE L. JOHNSON and CARRIE L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION, THE BENDIX CORPORATION, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HELMACY v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86317
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., EXXON MOBIL CORP., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOAN G. HELMACY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAYNE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86357
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., 3M, EXXON MOBIL CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
BONNIE LEE PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHANNON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86367
Defendant:
CRANE COMPANY, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AUBREY L. SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86390
Defendant:
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, JOHN CRANE, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD E. WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
