Cases 121 - 130 of 147
Downing v. Gentry et al
as 2:2016cv02632
Defendant:
Adams, Akash, Barbara Cegavske and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Downing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholson v. Gentry et al
as 2:2016cv02553
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Darion Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv00556
Defendant:
James Cox, James Dzurenda, Jo Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholson v. Gentry et al
as 2:2016cv02236
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Darion Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Petty v. Gentry et al
as 2:2016cv02105
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Anthony Edward Petty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Serena Gateb v. Jo Gentry, et al
as 16-16506
Petitioner - Appellant:
SERENA GATEB
Respondent - Appellee:
JO GENTRY and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEVADA
Thomas v. Cox et al
as 2:2016cv00080
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Beebe Clark, James G. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pascua v. Gentry et al
as 2:2016cv01738
Defendant:
Brian Connett, Jo Gentry, Tanya Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Bridget Pascua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sena v. Gentry et al
as 2:2016cv01534
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Terrie L. Sena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sena v. Gentry et al
as 2:2016cv01309
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Terrie Lynne Sena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
