Cases 121 - 130 of 3,036
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kansas, State of, ex rel., Derek Schmidt, Attorney General v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 5:2023cv04002
Plaintiff:
The State of Kansas, ex rel., Derek Schmidt, Attorney General and Kansas, State of, ex rel., Derek Schmidt, Attorney General
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gaedeke Holdings VII, Ltd. et al v. Williams
as 2:2022mc00208
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Randall v. Ignite Medical Resort Rainbow Boulevard, LLC
as 2:2022cv02535
Plaintiff:
Doris Randall
Defendant:
IGNITE MEDICAL RESORT RAINBOW BOULEVARD, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
