Cases 121 - 130 of 35,812
King v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02047
Plaintiff:
Troy Demond King
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Diaz v. O' Malley
as 3:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Pricilla Jesse Diaz
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
(SS) Chapman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Leslie A. Chapman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Angelo T. Gullotti v. Martin J. O Malley
as 2:2024cv02744
Plaintiff:
Angelo T. Gullotti
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(SS) Kaur v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Jasbir Kaur
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(SS) Stein v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Anastasia Joy Stein
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Robyn Ann Goodman v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Robyn Ann Goodman
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Maria Eugenia Rodriguez v. Martin J. O Malley
as 2:2024cv02723
Plaintiff:
Maria Eugenia Rodriguez
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
David Mad Lujan v. Martin OMalley
as 5:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
David Mad Lujan
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jonathan Aviles v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02725
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Aviles
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
