Cases 121 - 130 of 14,094
WRIGHT v. DEAN
as 4:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
URSULA DEAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. HARRIS
as 4:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
TODD E WATSON
Respondent:
SHEVAUN HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
DAVHON YOUNG and DA'VHON YOUNG
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. WARDEN FRANKLIN CI
as 4:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
TERRY SANDERS
Respondent:
WARDEN FRANKLIN CI and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENDERSON v. MERCER, et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
WADE MERCER, SALES PERSON EMPLOYEE, WILLIAMS R WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. KING et al
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES and JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
JOSHEPH J BIDEN, WAKULLA ANNEX CORRECTION INSTITUTION SHIFT SUPERVISOR, SGT DICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEAGLES v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
JOHNNY DALTON BEAGLES
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERS v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
JEREMIE ODELL PETERS
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
EDWARD LEE BROWN
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOYON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
RYAN R DOYON and RYAN ROBERT DOYON
Defendant:
MR RICKY DIXON, MR KEEN, TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
