Cases 141 - 150 of 89,099
Sapp v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02504
Plaintiff:
Herman Mack Sapp
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Neal v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02499
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Neal
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wardean v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02514
Plaintiff:
Mark Wardean
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Savoy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02538
Plaintiff:
Timothy Savoy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hopkins et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02524
Plaintiff:
Henry Hopkins and Ebony Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2024cv02519
Plaintiff:
Chad Hill
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barsh v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02521
Plaintiff:
James Barsh
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cox v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02527
Plaintiff:
Angela Cox
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bentzel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02522
Plaintiff:
Virginia Bentzel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02509
Plaintiff:
Angela Thompson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
