Cases 151 - 160 of 889
Mail Boxes Etc., Inc. v. Perone et al
as 3:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Mail Boxes Etc., Inc.
Defendant:
Paul A. Perone, Inez Perone, Perones, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
United States Postal Service Express Mail Parcel EI002320798US
as 2:2012mj00088
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
United States Postal Service Express Mail Parcel EI002320798US (1)
USA v. United States Postal Service Express Mail Parcel E1049188479US
as 2:2012mj00090
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
United States Postal Service Express Mail Parcel E1049188479US (1)
USA v. United States Postal Service Express Mail Parcel EI002320798US
as 2:2012mj00088
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
United States Postal Service Express Mail Parcel EI002320798US (1)
United States Postal Service Express Mail Parcel E1049188479US
as 2:2012mj00090
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
United States Postal Service Express Mail Parcel E1049188479US (1)
USA v. United States Postal Service Express Mail Parcel EI002320807US
as 2:2012mj00089
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
United States Postal Service Express Mail Parcel EI002320807US (1)
United States Postal Service Express Mail Parcel EI002320807US
as 2:2012mj00089
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
United States Postal Service Express Mail Parcel EI002320807US (1)
USPS EXPRESS MAIL PARCEL EV684140054US
as 2:2011mj03022
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
USPS EXPRESS MAIL PARCEL EV684140054US (1)
USA v. USPS EXPRESS MAIL PARCEL EV684140054US
as 2:2011mj03022
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
USPS EXPRESS MAIL PARCEL EV684140054US (1)
USA v. FEDERAL EXPRESS ("FED EX") MAIL PARCEL, WITH FED EX TRACKING NUMBER 8754 8718 0600, ADDRESSED TO 5250 W. EL SEGUNDO BLVD, HAWTHORNE, CA
as 2:2011mj02960
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS ("FED EX") MAIL PARCEL, WITH FED EX TRACKING NUMBER 8754 8718 0600, ADDRESSED TO 5250 W. EL SEGUNDO BLVD, HAWTHORNE, CA (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
