Cases 161 - 170 of 467
CRAYTON v. DAVIS
as 1:2017cv02026
Plaintiff:
LEE DARRELL CRAYTON
Defendant:
LORIE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. DAVIES et al
as 1:2017cv01873
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
DANIALU BABATONDE DAVIES and ANTHONY LAWRENCE CONTI
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
SUN v. OBAMA BARACK-DOG et al
as 1:2017cv01861
Plaintiff:
XIU JIAN SUN
Defendant:
OBAMA BARACK-DOG, P. DAVIS OLIVER, BENJAMIN C. MIZER and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1006
DAVIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv01758
Plaintiff:
CHERYL DAVIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
JENKINS v. TILLBROOK et al
as 1:2017cv01562
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
CHAD E. TILLBROOK and DAVIS & DAVIS LAW FIRM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHOOLEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2017cv01376
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M SCHOOLEY , JIMMY N ADAMS, CAROL S ADAMS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and IRANIAN ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS AKA THE PASDARAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
WILSON v. LESICCO et al
as 1:2017cv01348
Plaintiff:
GERALD JERRY WILSON
Defendant:
VANESSA M. LESICCO, LYDIA E. GIVAY, JOSEPH C. WELTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. TILLBROOK et al
as 1:2017cv01346
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
CHAD E. TILLBROOK and DAVIS & DAVIS LAW FIRM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
