Cases 161 - 170 of 543,773
Alsayedi et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv03902
Plaintiff:
Salah Mohamed Alsayedi and S & A 99 Cents Plus Corp.
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
KRAUS v. Northport VA Medical Center et al
as 2:2024cv03648
Plaintiff:
MR. DANIEL KRAUS
Defendant:
Northport VA Medical Center and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KRAUS v. Northport VA Medical Center et al
as 2:2024cv03649
Plaintiff:
MR. DANIEL KRAUS
Defendant:
Northport VA Medical Center and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sikder v. Garland
as 24-1362
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED LOKMAN SIKDER, FARJANA AKTER, MOHAMMED SAFWAN SIKDER and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Banoka S.a.r.l. v. Alvarez & Marsal, Inc.
as 24-1352
Petitioner:
BANOKA S.A.R.L., ATYS S.A., RENATO PICCIOTTO and others
Respondent:
ALVAREZ & MARSAL, INC., ALVAREZ & MARSAL TRANSACTION ADVISORY GROUP, LLC, ALVAREZ & MARSAL HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Zero Carbon Holdings, LLC v. Aspiration Partners, Inc.
as 24-1351
Plaintiff:
ZERO CARBON HOLDINGS, LLC and FOUR THIRTEEN, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
ASPIRATION PARTNERS, INC.
Rodriguez-Cecias v. Garland
as 24-1367
Petitioner:
DONNY ANDRE RODRIGUEZ-CECIAS, KARLA STEPHANIE MIRANDA-MANRIQUE and EITHAN SEBASTIAN RODRIGUEZ-MIRANDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Brik v. Brodie
as 24-1347
Plaintiff:
ROMAN BRIK
Defendant:
MARGO K. BRODIE, CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, in individual and official capacity and ANN M. DONNELLY, DISTRICT JUDGE, in individual and official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
