Cases 181 - 190 of 6,621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04812
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Joers et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04790
Defendant:
Exactech US, Inc. and Exactech, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jason Joers and Anne Joers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frank v. Exactech, US, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04773
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, US, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anna Frank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05176
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Argo Group US v. MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
as 1:2024cv05165
Plaintiff:
Argo Group US
Defendant:
MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 mc Marine Contract
Friedman v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 1:2024cv05166
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk US Commercial Holdings Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Friedman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04724
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04725
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
