Cases 181 - 190 of 4,986
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2023cv03879
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2023cv03884
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Wright v. Impulse Training, LLC
as 5:2023cv02181
Plaintiff:
Brittany Wright
Defendant:
Impulse Training, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Ground Penetrating Radar Systems, LLC v. GPRS Holdings, LLC et al.
as 3:2023cv01919
Plaintiff:
Ground Penetrating Radar Systems, LLC
Defendant:
GPRS Holdings, LLC and Ground Penetrating Radar Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2023cv00696
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
GS Holistic, LLC v. Ajmal et al
as 2:2023cv03269
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Muhammad Ajmal, Straight Up Food Mart LLC doing business as Straight Up Smoke Shop & Food Mart and Murtaza H. Jamshaid
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
GS Holistic, LLC v. M.W. & Sons, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
GS HOLISTIC, LLC
Defendant:
M.W. & SONS, INC, MAHMOUD WAHDAN, MANEER WAHDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2023cv03561
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2023cv03562
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
