Cases 11 - 20 of 2,098
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION v. BECERRA et al
as 1:2024cv02234
Defendant:
ROBERT M. CALIFF and XAVIER BECERRA
Plaintiff:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
ESTATE OF AYELET ARNIN et al v. DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA
as 1:2024cv02093
Plaintiff:
R.S., ESTATE OF AVRAHAM HANKIN, YAFFA HANKIN and others
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
CASH v. ELAN et al
as 1:2024cv02057
Plaintiff:
FELICIA CASH
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT I. ELAN, EVAN STUART ELAN and ELAN LAW FIRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
WANG v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01954
Defendant:
ROBERT FORDEN, ANTONY BLINKEN, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
CHENYU WANG
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
