Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 587
SWEEZY et al v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60939
Plaintiff: MITCHELL SWEEZY and AGNES SWEEZY
Defendant: A C & S, INC. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GUIDRY et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61802
Plaintiff: JAMES DEWEY GUIDRY and RUBY LEE GUIDRY
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KNIEF v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv79382
Plaintiff: GORDON KNIEF
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ENGEN v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv37851
Plaintiff: NORMAN A. ENGEN
Defendant: UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION , USX CORPORATION and PITTSBURGH STEAMSHIP COMPANY
Thirdparty_defendant: BABCOCK AND WILCOX COMPANY , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, ATLAS TURNER, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HANSON v. BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37796
Plaintiff: HAROLD H HANSON
Defendant: BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY , CLEVELAND CLIFFS IRON COMPANY , CLEVELAND CLIFFS S.S. COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: USX CORPORATION , INLAND STEEL CO. , CLEVELAND CLIFFS S.S. COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_defendant: FLEXITALLIC GASKET COMPANY, LAPP INSULATOR COMPANY , LESLIE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WASHSMUTH v. GRAND TRUNK MILWAUKEE C/F COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37953
Plaintiff: JULIAN H WASHSMUTH
Defendant: GRAND TRUNK MILWAUKEE C/F COMPANY , OGLEBAY NORTON COMPANY , USS PITTSBURGH FLEET and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: USX CORPORATION and OGLEBAY NORTON COMPANY
Thirdparty_defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, A. P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY , AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY and others
Counter_defendant: USX CORP and JULIAN H WASHSMUTH
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
KAHL et al v. AMERICAN FOREIGN S. S. CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv37910
Plaintiff: NICK KAHL , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant: AMERICAN FOREIGN S. S. CORPORATION , AMERICAN PACIFIC, AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LIMITED and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: TEXACO INC , USS PITTSBURGH FLEET and UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Thirdparty_defendant: GAF CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER IND INC, MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and others
Counter_defendant: USX CORP
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BARTEL et al v. BUCKEYE STEAMSHIP CO et al
as 2:2010cv37915
Plaintiff: WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant: BUCKEYE STEAMSHIP CO, INTERLAKE STEAMSHIP COMPANY , KINSMAN LINES INC. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: RAYMOND G. SHINSKI, USX CORPORATION, UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_defendant: M. H. DETRICK COMPANY , KAISER ALUMINUM AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION , TURNER AND NEWELL and others
Counter_defendant: US STEEL CORP
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SCOTT v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv37940
Plaintiff: CHARLES M. SCOTT
Defendant: UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION , WILSON MARINE TRANSIT, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_defendant: M. H. DETRICK COMPANY , LESLIE COMPANY , KAISER ALUMINUM AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION and others
Counter_defendant: USX CORP
Thirdparty_plaintiff: UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PAYMENT v. BROWNING STEAMSHIP COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37914
Plaintiff: ROBERT G. PAYMENT
Defendant: BROWNING STEAMSHIP COMPANY, CLEVELAND CLIFFS S.S. COMPANY , USS GREAT LAKES FLEET, INC. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: USX CORPORATION and CLEVELAND CLIFFS S.S. COMPANY
Thirdparty_defendant: JOHNS MANVILLE FUND, A. P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY , A AND M INSULATION COMPANY and others
Counter_defendant: USX CORP and ROBERT G. PAYMENT
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?