Cases 11 - 20 of 333
WILLIAMS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv58826
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP., FELT PRODUCTS INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COPELAND v. AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
as 2:2011cv58099
Plaintiff:
EARL E. COPELAND
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
FRANKLIN v. AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
as 2:2011cv57887
Plaintiff:
ALFRED C FRANKLIN
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
as 2:2011cv57849
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WALKER et al v. AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
as 2:2011cv52403
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
as 2:2011cv49750
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
STIMAC et al v. AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
as OHN/1:90-CV-10754
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
Plaintiff:
STIMAC
FANTROY v. AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
as 2:2011cv52370
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH FANTROY
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ABRAHAMSSON et al v. AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP., ET. AL.
as 2:2011cv52345
Plaintiff:
HELGE I. ABRAHAMSSON , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP., ET. AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CROMBIE et al v. AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
as 2:2011cv52327
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
