Cases 11 - 20 of 29
METODIEV v. ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2014cv03991
Plaintiff:
GEORGI METODIEV
Defendant:
ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
YOUNG v. ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2013cv00330
Plaintiff:
LEROY YOUNG
Defendant:
ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JONES v. ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT INC.
as 2:2012cv07239
Plaintiff:
AUDREY L. JONES
Defendant:
ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ANDREW et al v. ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT INC.
as 2:2011cv04523
Plaintiff:
RAY ANDREW and LAVERNE ANDREW
Defendant:
ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KUCZYNSKI v. ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT INC. et al
as 2:2011cv02906
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA KUCZYNSKI
Defendant:
ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT INC. , CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. and NORTHLAND GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MEYER v. ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT INC.
as 2:2011cv01049
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MEYER
Defendant:
ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
VICKERY v. ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2010cv07071
Plaintiff:
REGAN VICKERY
Defendant:
ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MEROLA v. ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT INC.
as 2:2010cv05670
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEROLA
Defendant:
ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PHELPS v. ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT INC.
as 2:2010cv04391
Plaintiff:
DIMETRI A. PHELPS
Defendant:
ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
