Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Odyssey Reinsurance Company v. Nagby et al
as 3:2016cv03038
Defendant:
Nagby, David Dostalik, Richard Keith Nagby and others
Plaintiff:
Odyssey Reinsurance Company
Intervenor:
Knight Insurance Company, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 op
Amtrust North America, Inc. et al v. KF and B, Inc. et al
as 2:2018mc00109
Plaintiff:
Technology Insurance Company, Inc, Wesco Insurance Company and Amtrust North America, Inc.
Defendant:
KF&B, Inc. d/b/a KF&B Program Managers Insurance Services, KF and B, Inc. and KF and B, Inc. doing business as KF and B Program Managers Insurance Services
Respondent:
BB&T Insurance Services Of California, Inc.
Petitioner:
BB and T Insurance Services of California, Inc.
In Re:
Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum Directed to BB and T Insurance Services of California, Inc.
Maxum Indemnity Company v. Amtrust North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00175
Plaintiff:
Maxum Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Amtrust North America, Inc. , Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation and Does 1 through 10
Cross_claimant:
Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation
Cross_defendant:
Amtrust North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Amtrust North America, Inc. v. Safebuilt Insurance Service, Inc.
as 3:2017mc00083
Plaintiff:
Amtrust North America, Inc.
Defendant:
Safebuilt Insurance Service, Inc.
Amtrust North America, Inc. et al v. Safebuilt Insurance Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2016mc00145
Defendant:
Safebuilt Insurance Services, Inc. , Taft Companies, LLC , Preferred Global Holdings, Inc. and others
Movant:
Jeff Holhbein
Plaintiff:
Amtrust North America, Inc. and Technology Insurance Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Amtrust North America, Inc. et al v. Pacific RE, Inc. et al
as 3:2016mc00622
Petitioner:
Amtrust North America, Inc. and Technology Insurance Company, Inc.
Respondent:
Pacific RE, Inc. and PAC RE 5-AT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
