Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Hogan et al v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
James Hogan and Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction, Kevin Kempf, Jeff Zmuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Sandy et al
as 1:2014cv00152
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Robin Sandy, David McClusky, J.R. Van Tassel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds et al v. Sandy et al
as 1:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Allan P Reynolds and Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Robin Sandy, David McClusky, J.R. Van Tassel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Wolf v. C. Otter, et al
as 13-36016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW J.J. WOLF
Defendant - Appellee:
C. L. OTTER, (Butch), IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, ROBIN SANDY and others
Wolf v. Otter et al
as 1:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
C.L. (Butch) Otter, Idaho State Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf et al v. Otter et al
as 1:2012cv00526
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf, R Hans Kruger and David S Begley
Defendant:
C.L. Butch Otter, Lawrence Wasden, Idaho State Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf v. Smith
as 1:2011cv00404
Petitioner:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Respondent:
Johanna Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wolf v. Reinke et al
as 1:2011cv00225
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Shane Evans, Rona Siegert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Adams et al
as 1:2010cv00482
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Joanne Adams and Chester Penn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Valdez, et al
as 1:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez, Daniel Prado, Shane Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
