Cases 11 - 20 of 107
BARLEY et al v. AIRCO, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv93426
Defendant:
BRIGGS FILTRATION CO., SEARS ROEBUCK & CO., ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. and others
Petitioner:
JOHN CRANE INC.
Plaintiff:
JO ELLEN BARLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MESHAW et al v. AIRCO, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv93427
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK & CO., 3M COMPANY, BRIGGS FILTRATION CO. and others
Petitioner:
JOHN CRANE INC.
Plaintiff:
NELLIE S. MESHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS et al v. AIRCO, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv93428
Defendant:
ALLIED SIGNAL, INC., CONTINENTAL BOILERS, INC., SEARS ROEBUCK & CO. and others
Petitioner:
JOHN CRANE INC.
Plaintiff:
CURTIS D. EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK et al v. AIRCO, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv93429
Defendant:
CONTINENTAL BOILERS, INC., SEARS ROEBUCK & CO., BRIGGS FILTRATION CO. and others
Petitioner:
JOHN CRANE INC.
Plaintiff:
RUTH NMH CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MASSEY et al v. AIRCO, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv93432
Defendant:
ALLIED SIGNAL, INC., CONTINENTAL BOILERS, INC., SEARS ROEBUCK & CO. and others
Plaintiff:
SHERYL R. MASSEY
Petitioner:
JOHN CRANE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRAUER v. ABEX CORP et al
as 2:2010cv61795
Plaintiff:
MARTIN E. BRAUER
Defendant:
ABEX CORP, AC AND S INC, ADIENCE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. ABEX CORP et al
as 2:2010cv61824
Plaintiff:
LADONA IRENE HOWARD
Defendant:
ABEX CORP, AC AND S INC, ADIENCE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. ABEX CORP et al
as 2:2010cv61818
Plaintiff:
LADONA IRENE HOWARD
Defendant:
ABEX CORP, AC AND S INC, ADIENCE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. ABEX CORP et al
as 2:2010cv61821
Plaintiff:
BILL HILL
Defendant:
ABEX CORP, AC AND S INC, ADIENCE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. ABEX CORP et al
as 2:2010cv61797
Plaintiff:
LADONA IRENE HOWARD
Defendant:
ABEX CORP, AC AND S INC, ADIENCE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
