Cases 11 - 20 of 28
PEARSON v. UNITY HEALTH CARE INC. et al
as 1:2008cv01753
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON
Defendant:
UNITY HEALTH CARE INC., ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, INCORPORATED, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PEARSON v. CAULFIELD
as 1:2008cv01691
Petitioner:
DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON
Respondent:
JOHN CAULFIELD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
YOUNG v. CAULFIELD
as 1:2008cv01603
Petitioner:
HERBERT FRANCIS YOUNG
Respondent:
JOHN CAULFIELD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GARNER v. CAULFIELD
as 1:2008cv01076
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HENRY GARNER
Respondent:
JOHN CAULFIELD
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
WATSON v. GAINES et al
as 1:2008cv01075
Petitioner:
MELVIN V. WATSON, JR.
Respondent:
MICHAEL GAINES, BROW, CAULFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BEY v. REILLY et al
as 1:2008cv00311
Plaintiff:
MELVIN CROSBY BEY
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., DEVON BROWN and JOHN CAULFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILSON v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv01522
Petitioner:
THOMAS WILSON
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and JOHN CAULFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEE v. CAULFIELD et al
as 1:2007cv01376
Petitioner:
MELVIN B. LEE
Respondent:
JOHN CAULFIELD and U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JACKSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2007cv01184
Plaintiff:
DEREK JACKSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ALBERTO GONZALES, HECTOR LEDESMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. CAULFIELD
as 1:2007cv01182
Petitioner:
KEVIN CHARLES FORD, SR.
Respondent:
JOHN CAULFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
