Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Newman et al v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv00449
Plaintiff:
Charles Newman , Gary Johnson and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Centrus Energy Corp., United States Enrichment Corporation and United States Enrichment Corporation Health and Welfare Plan for Retirees
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Madsen v. American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO/CLC, Local 24
as 5:2013cv02519
Plaintiff:
Linda Madsen
Defendant:
American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO/CLC, Local 24
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 648, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Pearson Electric, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00751
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 648, AFL-CIO, CLC
Defendant:
Pearson Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Horvat et al v. Compco Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01111
Plaintiff:
Stephen Horvat and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
Defendant:
Compco Industries, Inc. and Hospitalization For Retirees and Spouses Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 648, AFL-CIO, CLC, et al. v. Hamilton, City of
as 1:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 648, AFL-CIO, CLC , Dave Schlueter , Robert C. Angst and others
Defendant:
Hamilton, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pearson Electric, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 648, AFL-CIO, CLC
as 1:2013cv00209
Petitioner:
Pearson Electric, Inc.
Respondent:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 648, AFL-CIO, CLC
Counter_claimant:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 648, AFL-CIO, CLC
Counter_defendant:
Pearson Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Local 1-7001, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Worke
as 1:2012cv01158
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
Defendant:
Local 1-7001, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, PNC Bank, National Association and Parma Service Workers Local 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Jones v. International Longshoremen's Assoc., AFL-CIO, CLC et al
as 3:2012cv00345
Plaintiff:
Lavern Jones
Defendant:
International Longshoremen's Assoc., AFL-CIO, CLC , Harold Daggett , Richard Hughes and others
Movant:
Marvin Smith , Randy Baumer , Herbert Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
McCoy et al v. Eljer Plumbingware, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv02529
Plaintiff:
Robert McCoy and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Eljer Plumbingware, Inc. and Group Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union et al v. U.S. Natural Resources
as 1:2010cv01742
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union and Local 12833 United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
Defendant:
U.S. Natural Resources
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
