Cases 11 - 20 of 66
CAMP v. A.C. AND S, INC. A CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv64600
Plaintiff:
MABEL CAMP
Defendant:
A.C. AND S, INC. A CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LOFGREN v. A C & S INC et al
as 5:2008cv92316
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY I LOFGREN
Defendant:
A C & S INC, CLEAVER-BROOKS COMPANY, INC., COMBUSTION ENGINEERING and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DUAL v. A P GREEN INDUSTRIES et al
as 5:2008cv92314
Defendant:
A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, C E THURSTON AND SONS, INC, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING INC and others
Plaintiff:
ROCK DUAL
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DE DECKER v. A C & S INC et al
as 5:2008cv92315
Plaintiff:
JAMES F DE DECKER
Defendant:
A C & S INC, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, ASEA BROWN BOVERI, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
POTTS v. AC&S et al
as 2:2008cv91872
Plaintiff:
STANLEY C. POTTS
Defendant:
AC&S, AC&S, A P GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DANNER v. AC & S et al
as 2:2008cv91873
Plaintiff:
VICTOR H DANNER
Defendant:
AC & S, AMERICAN STEEL AND WIRE CO, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BURTON v. A C & S INC et al
as 5:2008cv92309
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E BURTON
Defendant:
A C & S INC, A C & S INC, A C & S INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DE DECKER v. A C & S INC et al
as 5:2008cv92317
Plaintiff:
JAMES F DE DECKER
Defendant:
A C & S INC, CERTAINTEED CORP, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LOVE v. A C & S INC et al
as 5:2008cv92310
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D LOVE, SR
Defendant:
A C & S INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HARDY et al v. A C & S INC et al
as 5:2008cv92313
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARDY
Defendant:
A C & S INC, A C & S INC, A C & S INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
