Cases 11 - 15 of 15
In re: Thorpe Insulation Company
as 10-56543
Debtor:
In the Matter of: THORPE INSULATION COMPANY
Appellant:
MOTOR VEHICLE CASUALTY COMPANY, CENTRAL NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF OMAHA and CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, successor to Cigna Specialty Insurance Company, FKA California Union Insurance Company
Appellee:
THORPE INSULATION COMPANY and PACIFIC INSULATION COMPANY
Real Party In Interest:
NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, as successor by merger to Transcontinental Insurance Company, CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, as successor in interest to certain policies issued by Harbor Insurance Company, OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, of Thorpe Insulation Company and Pacific Insulation Company and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01537
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01532
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
213) 689-7401 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00246
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Azizian et al v. Federated Department Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2003cv03359
Plaintiff:
Fatemah Azizian , Soraya Farrah , Eunice Fey and others
Defendant:
Federated Department Stores, Inc. , Boucheron (USA) Ltd. , Chanel, Inc. and others
Objector:
Susan Casenza , Valerie Theng Matherne , Kamela Wilkinson and others
Intervenor:
Susan Casenza and Valerie Theng Matherne
Pecial_master:
Charles B. Renfrew (Ret.)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
