Cases filed in Delaware
Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Dougherty et al v. A O Smith Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01972
Plaintiff: Francis J. Dougherty and Elizabeth F. Dougherty
Defendant: A O Smith Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Bell & Gossett Pump Company and others
Cross_claimant: John Crane Inc.
Cross_defendant: A O Smith Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Bell & Gossett Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Johnson et al v. Advance Auto Parts Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00345
Defendant: BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Georgia Pacific LLC, Goodrich Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Charles Johnson and Ruby Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
White et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv01085
Plaintiff: Cynthia White , Rose White and Jimmy George White
Defendant: 3M Company, Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant: General Electric Company and Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant: General Electric Company , 3M Company, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Allen et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv01014
Plaintiff: Jerry Allen and Lou Ann Allen
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation, Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Zeoli v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00832
Plaintiff: Angelo Zeoli
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. , CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant: IMO Industries Inc. , Crown Cork & Seal Company Inc. , General Electric Company and others
Cross_defendant: IMO Industries Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Borders et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv00612
Plaintiff: Bettie Borders and Kenneth Borders
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company , Acme Engineering Products Inc., Advance Auto Parts Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: 84 Lumber Company , The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: AII Acquisitions LLC, Acme Engineering Products Inc., Advance Auto Parts Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Hicks v. The Boeing Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00393
Plaintiff: John Hicks
Defendant: The Boeing Company , BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Crown Cork & Seal Company Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: General Dynamics Corporation , General Electric Company and Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant: General Dynamics Corporation , BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Crown Cork & Seal Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Carriveau v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv00198
Plaintiff: Donna Carriveau
Defendant: 3M Company, 84 Lumber Company , Borg Warner Corporation and others
Cross_claimant: 84 Lumber Company , Union Carbide Corporation, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cross_defendant: 84 Lumber Company , 3M Company, Borg Warner Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
McCrocklin et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2012cv01483
Plaintiff: William M. McCrocklin and Judith M. McCrocklin
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Biltrite Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Pease v. Crane Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00624
Defendant: CBS Corporation, Soco-West Inc., Union Carbide Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Jeremy Pease, Christopher Pease and Herbert Pease
Special Master: SPECIAL MASTER Vincent J. Poppiti, -SM-
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?