Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Vaca v. Reubart
as 3:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Juan Vaca
Defendant:
William Reubart, Curtis Rigney and Michael Stolks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvell v. Rigney et al
as 3:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Sean Harvell
Defendant:
Chet Rigney, Shane Brown, Curtis Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Pickens et al
as 3:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Sanchez
Defendant:
Madeline Pickens, Curtis Rigney and Stolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newson v. Moore et al
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Vernon Newson
Defendant:
Thuriston Moore, Leong, Vaiio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parros v. Rigney et al
as 3:2022cv00561
Plaintiff:
Nevin Parros
Defendant:
Chet Rigney, Curtis Rigney, CO Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris
Defendant:
State of Nevada, NDOC, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Rigney et al
as 3:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Javis Blake
Defendant:
CO Chet Rigney and Lt Curtis Rigney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Rowley et al
as 3:2022cv00547
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D Welch
Defendant:
Cory Rowley, William Reubart, David Drummond and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Truman v. Moore et al
as 3:2022cv00548
Plaintiff:
Curtis Truman
Defendant:
Thuriston Moore, Houston, Leong and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Pickens et al
as 3:2022cv00543
Plaintiff:
Diondrae L. Parker
Defendant:
Pickens, Brandon Stubbs, Kleer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
