Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
v. KING et al
as 2:2010cv38832
Defendant: LAWRENCE D. KING , A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
KING V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35126
Plaintiff: WILLIE D. KING
Defendant: UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
KING et al v. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv86668
Plaintiff: DANNY KING and KATHY D. KING
Defendant: GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP., PFIZER INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
KING v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76227
Plaintiff: SHEROL D. KING
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
KING v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv84595
Plaintiff: EVERETT D. KING
Defendant: AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., THE BUDD COMPANY, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
KING v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv70463
Plaintiff: BOBBY D. KING and BOBBY D. KING
Defendant: OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., ALLIED SIGNAL, INC., ABNEY MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KING v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv60464
Plaintiff: GEORGE D. KING, GEORGE D. KING, GEORGE D. KING and others
Defendant: E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KING et al v. UNION CARBIDE CORP et al
as 2:2007cv73684
Plaintiff: ROY D KING and WILMA R KING
Defendant: UNION CARBIDE CORP, ATLAS ASBESTOS CORP., CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?