Cases 11 - 15 of 15
Qing Guo et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv03887
Plaintiff:
Qing Guo, Chengkui Yu, Zhenni Yu and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES LOS ANGELES ASYLUM OFFICE and Director of the Unitd States Citizenship and Immigration Services Los Angeles Asylum Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hongxin Du et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv03428
Plaintiff:
HONGXIN DU, XIYUN NI, AINI DU and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES LOS ANGELES ASYLUM OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jingyu Zeng et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv03430
Plaintiff:
JINGYU ZENG, HONG ZHANG and CHEN ZHANG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES LOS ANGELES ASYLUM OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Meiting Yu et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv02199
Plaintiff:
Meiting Yu, Shanping He, Chuanjie He and others
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Los Angeles Asylum Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Qinkai Tan v. Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Los Angeles Asylum Office et al
as 2:2023cv00816
Plaintiff:
QINKAI TAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES LOS ANGELES ASYLUM OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
