Cases 11 - 20 of 396
Oelker v. Idaho State Bar (ISB) et al
as 2:2024cv00770
Petitioner:
Jeromy Oelker
Respondent:
Idaho State Bar (ISB), Director Diane Minnich and Attorney Thomas Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Glover v. Brown et al
as 2:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Jeff Glover
Defendant:
C/O Brown, C/O Swedias, Warden Hutching and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lambeth v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Jacob Lambeth
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, Director of Medical, Director of Nursing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Warden Oliver et al
as 2:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Allan Moore
Defendant:
Warden Oliver, Chief Witmore, O.M.D. and Director Dzurenda, Doc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Coil v. Williamson et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
David Coil
Defendant:
Warden Brian Williamson and Director Nevada Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wygnanski v. Director of the Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wygnanski
Defendant:
Director of the Nevada Department of Corrections and Warden of the Lovelock Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
